Sunday, March 17, 2013

Action Research Update


Abstract



Title and Author
How will completing the process of becoming part of the No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League affect the culture of our campus, most notably anti-bullying efforts?  By Joel Fontenot-Amedee.

Introduction/Background
The name of the school in which the study took place is CBHS.  Our campus is one that is very diverse.  According to TexasTribute.org, in 2010 our population was broken down into the following groups:  16.3%African American, 40% White, 21.2% Hispanic, 0.2% Native American and 14.3 % Asian/Pacific Islander.  20.4% of our students are Economically Disadvantaged, 35.2% are At Risk, and 2.6 % are LEP (Clear Brook).  Our currently has roughly school has 2700 students.

The problem confronted in this research plan is how to create an environment on our campus that is free from bullying, prejudice and hate.  Bullying is a problem on every campus.  Because our campus is one that has so many different subpopulations, it could potentially be a breeding ground for bullying activities.

 We are a campus that values diversity.  Part of our vision as a campus is to have our students live this vision out through their actions. The vision of this action research project is to improve the overall culture of our campus by creating a culture that respects and  accepts the diversity of our student body and faculty.  It is our goal to make everyone on our campus feel as though they are a valuable part of this school, and that they never feel as though their personal rights are being violated by a bully whether that be a student, teacher, or administrator associated with our school.  It is our hope that by completing all the activities needed to be part of the No Place for Hate, that we will increase the feeling of safety on our campus, and decrease bullying.  This will be measured by surveys, and interviews with students, parents, and staff.  Through this project, I will analyze how anti-bullying and diversity celebrating activities have affected this aspect of our campus community.  We will analyze the impact of these activities on the overall school environment. 

Everyone involved in our school will benefit from this project.  All stakeholders from the parents, to the students, to the teachers, to the administrators and everyone else that help make each day on our campus possible are involved in the safety and security felt at our school.  Most importantly, this project will study how activities needed to be part of the No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League affected the students who usually seem to slip through the cracks.  By this I mean the studies will show how students who are at risk, have a disconnection to the school culture, SPED, and possibly anti-social have been impacted by the activities. 





Literature Review
According to Scherr, two ways schools can reduce bullying is by investing in bullying prevention programs, and diversity training (p.3).   Scherr also mentions that schools should provide a list of behaviors that they will not allow to happen on the school’s campus (p.3).  The later was mimicked in our project when we provided all students the opportunity to sign the NPFH Resolution of Respect.  We had over 600 students sign the document which basically stated that the student would do what they could to prevent people from being bullied on our campus.   This article served as proof that our participation in the NPFH could potentially serve as a valuable way to reduce bullying on our campus because it is both a bullying prevention program and could serve as diversity training. 


Action Research Design

Subjects
The subjects are the student population at CBHS.

Procedures
After meeting with our Associate Principal, it was determined that I would be the lead on completing the paperwork, and creating the activities for our school to achieve No Place for Hate status.  It was also decided that our STUCO would be influential in the carrying out of the actual activities that were created. They were also in charge of providing any monetary funds that would  be needed for banners, and a donut party.  Our PALS organization was also given a prominent role.  This group volunteered their lunch time and free time after school to help promote the activities that were eventually completed.  The CBTV group was in charge of creating an anti-bullying video that was shown to every advisory class.  They created the video and posed a question following the video for the advisory classes to discuss.  They were also responsible for getting the information to our students concerning the door decorating contest that supported our anti-bullying campaign.  This was also presented during a video in our advisory classes.  During each activity on our campus that qualified us for No Place for Hate Status, there were at least two administrators and one teacher supervising. 

The product of a second meeting between myself and our Associate Principal was a calendar breaking down the possible dates for completing each of the four projects associated with the NPFHADL.  It was then my responsibility to follow campus protocol in securing each event with the appropriate assistant principal and organization responsible.  I was also put in charge of filling out the necessary paperwork to become part of the NPFHADL, which included the actual approval from the NPFHADL concerning the four activities we were using for application purposes. We used the needs assessment data by choosing activities that would encourage students who did not usually feel accepted to participate.  One of the driving forces in the activity selections was the need to impact all students on our campus.  We chose activities that would give every student and teacher on our campus an opportunity to participate.  We encouraged this through announcements over the loudspeaker and through CBTV commercials.  The NPFHADL requires that the opportunity for participation be provided to all students in order to receive approval. 


Data collection
 Based upon the parent/students surveys given out at the beginning of the school year, we felt as though we needed to increase the feeling of safety at our school.  Our survey asked students several questions about how they felt at school.  Of the students who completed the survey, 67% were female, 33% male.  Of the students who completed the survey,  78% spoke English at home, 12% Spanish, 2% Chinese, and 8% other. 
There were six questions asked that concerned student safety.  When asked if teachers and staff treated students fairly regardless of their backgrounds and differences the students surveyed, 12% strongly disagreed, 26% disagreed, 48% agreed, 10% Strongly Agreed, and 4% did not know.  While the majority of the students agreed, it is alarming that 38% of our students disagreed in some sort of way.  This is a reason we decided to have teachers participate in the activities necessary to become part of the NPFHADL.  When asked if they felt safe at school, 13% strongly disagreed, 8% disagreed, 69% agreed, 6% strongly agreed and 4% did not know.  The fact that 21% of our students surveyed did not feel safe at school was a big reason for creating this action research project.   When asked if  students do not threaten each other at this school, 16% strongly disagreed, 46% disagreed, 28% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 6% did not know.  While a strong 32% agreed, an overwhelming 62 % disagreed in some form.  This shows that a large percentage of students feel as though people are threatened on our campus.  We as an administration felt as though this had to be changed.  When asked if this school is a safe place from gang activity, 12 % strongly disagreed, 18% disagreed, 54% agreed, 4% strongly agreed, and 12% did not know.   When asked if most students are friendly to each other at this school, 12% strongly disagreed, 20% disagreed, 60% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 6% did not know.  Althought the majority agreed, we want strive to maintain a culture on our campus in which all students and faculty are friendly to each other.  When asked if Ifeel safe when on my school bus, 4%  strongly disagreed, 10% disagreed, 50% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 32% did not know.  Although it is on a school bus, and not on our actual campus, the administration felt as though it was important for students to feel safe and we want to make sure that a larger percentage of students feel safe on our buses.

Findings

Conclusions and Reccomendations


References


Clear Brook High School.  (n.d.)  Retrieved from

Scherr, Tracey G.  Bullying Others: Factoring in Race, Ethnicity and Immigration. 

  
             
























































Saturday, September 29, 2012

web conference reflection


I recently read the week 5 web conference from my Lamar Class.  I could not attend any of the sessions, because I am in the middle of football season.  I am currently working 90-100 hours a week, and trying to complete this course.  I really wanted to attend at least one of the conferences, but I was not able to attend. 
What I noticed from week 5 is that we have people from all over the state of Texas.  I think that’s a really unique aspect of our program.  I also noticed that I have a lot of the same concerns as other people in my class.  This web conference was helpful because I actually got answers to questions.  Another thing I noticed is that it is really hard to read through all the conversations.  I must attend a conference in my next class, but I’m thankful that our webinars are available as resource.

AR Project Reflection


I have laid the groundwork for the completion of my action research project.  I have met with my site mentor, and one of the lead counselors about application for our school to become part of the “No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League.  We have formed a committee in order to begin developing our shared vision for the project, as well as, the activities we will need in order to complete my project.  We have decided that we will complete all the activities needed for my action research plan after the conclusion of football season, because of my personal time constraints during this time.  I have completed approximately 10 hours towards the completion of my AR Project. 
A big part of becoming a NPFHADL School is planning out three activities that,” celebrate diversity and promotes respect amongst all students “(www.adl.org).  We have at least two of these types of activities already in place.  One example of this is our Mix it Up Day and the other is our Culture Carnival.  Both are great ways that our school celebrates its’ diverse students.
The next step for us as a committee is to plan our “Resolution of Respect” (www.adl.org).  The toughest part about planning this pep rally type event is the constraints state and benchmark testing put on scheduling school events.  I truly believe that this project is something that our administration believes strongly in, so we will find a way to complete it.  Overall, I have had outstanding support from my administration, and I am enjoying the process  of planning such an important research project.  

Sunday, August 19, 2012

reflection


The most memorable and helpful part of this course would have to be the discussion boards.  I was able to gain lots of insight from other student’s posts.  It was also encouraging to see that other students were having the same problems that I had throughout the course.  I am kind of shy when it comes to meeting new people, so having to participate in a discussion board was a great way for me to get to know new people in the educational world.  I was pleasantly surprised at how many students responded to my posts.  Because they weren’t all positive comments, I was able to improve my overall research plan, and solve several problems that I had when developing my plan.  

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Action Research Plan


Joel Fontenot-Amedee
EDLD 5301
8-2-12
Action Planning Template
Goal: To successfully implement the needed steps for our school to become a campus that is part of the No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League.

Step 1: Create a list of what needs to be done in order to achieve No Place for Hate Anti- Defamation League Status for our campus.
Person Responsible: Myself, and  the STUCO Leader.
Timeline: August 27, 2012-August 30, 2012
Needed Resources:  Internet access.
Evaluation:  Meeting the criteria set through this list

Step 2: Form a committee to oversee and help inform our advisory teachers how to    implement the five steps needed to become NPFHADL member
Person Responsible:  Myself, STUCO Leader, vice principals, and counselors.
Timeline: August 20th2012-August 24th 2012
Needed Resources:  School schedules, and teacher/administrator availability
Evaluation:  Create minutes for the meeting to highlight discussion items, and a survey will be submitted following the completion of the project to show the group’s effectiveness. 

Step 3: Organize “A presentation of the Resolution of Respect”  either during advisory or at a pep rally (No Place for Hate, 2006)
Person Responsible:  Myself, STUCO Leader, principals, administrators and the NOFDHADL committee
Timeline:  September 3rd, 2012-September 21st, 2012
Needed Resources:  Advisor and pep rally schedule, as well as an actual “Resolution of Respect” document (No Place for Hate, 2006)

Evaluation: Whether or not we have full participation will be evaluated, after the presentation, by staff members visiting the classroom

Step 4:  Choose and complete, within the year, three or more activities that celebrate diversity and promote respect (No Place for Hate, 2006)
Person Responsible:  Myself, STUCO Leader, principals, administrators, and the NOFHADL committee.
Timeline:  September 24, 2012-April 1, 2013
Needed Resources:  Benchmark testing scheduled dates, state testing dates, school extracurricular activity schedules, advisory schedule, and use of a facility (i.e. a gym, or field)
Evaluation:  Student participation, and student/teacher surveys regarding the effectiveness of the three activities

Step 5:  Gather data from both the previous and current year regarding incidents of hate on campus
Person Responsible:  Myself
Timeline:  May 1, 2013-June 1st 2013
Needed Resources:Campus incident reports from the 2011-2012 school year and the 2012-2013 year
Evaluation:  Compare the data of the incidents of hate for the current year to the previous year in order to determine the success of the program.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

25 or more word analysis of how an administrator might use blogs

There are many ways in which an administrator could use blogs.  First an administrator could use blogs in order to express new ideas the he or she wants to "bounce off" of their staff.  An administrator could use blogs to celebrate student achievement at their campus no matter how big or small.  An athletic administrator could use blogs to update the status of his or her extracurricular team.  Overall, blogs are a great way to communicate fresh ideas to a staff, and get feedback from all stakeholders.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

200 word reflection


Before this course, I had never heard of action research.  In fact, just the thought of research kind of turned my stomach.  However, I’ve changed my tune about research.  I’ve learned so much about action research.  I've learned that an action research is research that is chosen and created by someone who is considered an inside source.  By this, I mean that action research is created by someone who is inside the everyday operations of the school, so they have a good understanding of the problem being considered for research.  I've learned that the topic being considered for research should be one that the researcher is curious about, or believes there is an issue within the topic that needs to be resolved. 
One very important thing that I've learned about action research is that it is not your traditional research. What is interesting about action research is that the person doing the research gets to actually choose the topic they would like to research.  This gives the researcher an invaluable opportunity to have more buy-in during their individual researching process.  Traditionally, this was not the case.
In traditional research, the topic and the research has already been done, so it is spoon fed to the intended professional.  The teacher, for example, would be told both what the problem is and the answer to the problem.  In traditional research, this answer would be universal for all schools.  We now know that all schools are not the same. 
There should be no doubt that traditional research has positive benefits. However, it should be recognized that, in some cases, action research is a more personal and valuable mechanism for individual growth and the promotion of change within our schools.  
I am excited to have the opportunity to possibly use action research to analyze how my high school locks down our campus on a daily basis.  Another way I could possibly use action research would be to research the increase or decrease of theft within our sub-varsity football team's locker room.  Theft has been a problem for us in the past, so I think it would be invaluable to complete an action research project on the theft in our locker rooms in order to collaborate with my fellow coaches in developing a solution for the problem.