Sunday, March 17, 2013

Action Research Update


Abstract



Title and Author
How will completing the process of becoming part of the No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League affect the culture of our campus, most notably anti-bullying efforts?  By Joel Fontenot-Amedee.

Introduction/Background
The name of the school in which the study took place is CBHS.  Our campus is one that is very diverse.  According to TexasTribute.org, in 2010 our population was broken down into the following groups:  16.3%African American, 40% White, 21.2% Hispanic, 0.2% Native American and 14.3 % Asian/Pacific Islander.  20.4% of our students are Economically Disadvantaged, 35.2% are At Risk, and 2.6 % are LEP (Clear Brook).  Our currently has roughly school has 2700 students.

The problem confronted in this research plan is how to create an environment on our campus that is free from bullying, prejudice and hate.  Bullying is a problem on every campus.  Because our campus is one that has so many different subpopulations, it could potentially be a breeding ground for bullying activities.

 We are a campus that values diversity.  Part of our vision as a campus is to have our students live this vision out through their actions. The vision of this action research project is to improve the overall culture of our campus by creating a culture that respects and  accepts the diversity of our student body and faculty.  It is our goal to make everyone on our campus feel as though they are a valuable part of this school, and that they never feel as though their personal rights are being violated by a bully whether that be a student, teacher, or administrator associated with our school.  It is our hope that by completing all the activities needed to be part of the No Place for Hate, that we will increase the feeling of safety on our campus, and decrease bullying.  This will be measured by surveys, and interviews with students, parents, and staff.  Through this project, I will analyze how anti-bullying and diversity celebrating activities have affected this aspect of our campus community.  We will analyze the impact of these activities on the overall school environment. 

Everyone involved in our school will benefit from this project.  All stakeholders from the parents, to the students, to the teachers, to the administrators and everyone else that help make each day on our campus possible are involved in the safety and security felt at our school.  Most importantly, this project will study how activities needed to be part of the No Place for Hate Anti-Defamation League affected the students who usually seem to slip through the cracks.  By this I mean the studies will show how students who are at risk, have a disconnection to the school culture, SPED, and possibly anti-social have been impacted by the activities. 





Literature Review
According to Scherr, two ways schools can reduce bullying is by investing in bullying prevention programs, and diversity training (p.3).   Scherr also mentions that schools should provide a list of behaviors that they will not allow to happen on the school’s campus (p.3).  The later was mimicked in our project when we provided all students the opportunity to sign the NPFH Resolution of Respect.  We had over 600 students sign the document which basically stated that the student would do what they could to prevent people from being bullied on our campus.   This article served as proof that our participation in the NPFH could potentially serve as a valuable way to reduce bullying on our campus because it is both a bullying prevention program and could serve as diversity training. 


Action Research Design

Subjects
The subjects are the student population at CBHS.

Procedures
After meeting with our Associate Principal, it was determined that I would be the lead on completing the paperwork, and creating the activities for our school to achieve No Place for Hate status.  It was also decided that our STUCO would be influential in the carrying out of the actual activities that were created. They were also in charge of providing any monetary funds that would  be needed for banners, and a donut party.  Our PALS organization was also given a prominent role.  This group volunteered their lunch time and free time after school to help promote the activities that were eventually completed.  The CBTV group was in charge of creating an anti-bullying video that was shown to every advisory class.  They created the video and posed a question following the video for the advisory classes to discuss.  They were also responsible for getting the information to our students concerning the door decorating contest that supported our anti-bullying campaign.  This was also presented during a video in our advisory classes.  During each activity on our campus that qualified us for No Place for Hate Status, there were at least two administrators and one teacher supervising. 

The product of a second meeting between myself and our Associate Principal was a calendar breaking down the possible dates for completing each of the four projects associated with the NPFHADL.  It was then my responsibility to follow campus protocol in securing each event with the appropriate assistant principal and organization responsible.  I was also put in charge of filling out the necessary paperwork to become part of the NPFHADL, which included the actual approval from the NPFHADL concerning the four activities we were using for application purposes. We used the needs assessment data by choosing activities that would encourage students who did not usually feel accepted to participate.  One of the driving forces in the activity selections was the need to impact all students on our campus.  We chose activities that would give every student and teacher on our campus an opportunity to participate.  We encouraged this through announcements over the loudspeaker and through CBTV commercials.  The NPFHADL requires that the opportunity for participation be provided to all students in order to receive approval. 


Data collection
 Based upon the parent/students surveys given out at the beginning of the school year, we felt as though we needed to increase the feeling of safety at our school.  Our survey asked students several questions about how they felt at school.  Of the students who completed the survey, 67% were female, 33% male.  Of the students who completed the survey,  78% spoke English at home, 12% Spanish, 2% Chinese, and 8% other. 
There were six questions asked that concerned student safety.  When asked if teachers and staff treated students fairly regardless of their backgrounds and differences the students surveyed, 12% strongly disagreed, 26% disagreed, 48% agreed, 10% Strongly Agreed, and 4% did not know.  While the majority of the students agreed, it is alarming that 38% of our students disagreed in some sort of way.  This is a reason we decided to have teachers participate in the activities necessary to become part of the NPFHADL.  When asked if they felt safe at school, 13% strongly disagreed, 8% disagreed, 69% agreed, 6% strongly agreed and 4% did not know.  The fact that 21% of our students surveyed did not feel safe at school was a big reason for creating this action research project.   When asked if  students do not threaten each other at this school, 16% strongly disagreed, 46% disagreed, 28% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 6% did not know.  While a strong 32% agreed, an overwhelming 62 % disagreed in some form.  This shows that a large percentage of students feel as though people are threatened on our campus.  We as an administration felt as though this had to be changed.  When asked if this school is a safe place from gang activity, 12 % strongly disagreed, 18% disagreed, 54% agreed, 4% strongly agreed, and 12% did not know.   When asked if most students are friendly to each other at this school, 12% strongly disagreed, 20% disagreed, 60% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 6% did not know.  Althought the majority agreed, we want strive to maintain a culture on our campus in which all students and faculty are friendly to each other.  When asked if Ifeel safe when on my school bus, 4%  strongly disagreed, 10% disagreed, 50% agreed, 4% strongly agreed and 32% did not know.  Although it is on a school bus, and not on our actual campus, the administration felt as though it was important for students to feel safe and we want to make sure that a larger percentage of students feel safe on our buses.

Findings

Conclusions and Reccomendations


References


Clear Brook High School.  (n.d.)  Retrieved from

Scherr, Tracey G.  Bullying Others: Factoring in Race, Ethnicity and Immigration. 

  
             
























































No comments:

Post a Comment